Stijn Paardekooper vs Ryan Fishback Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Stijn Paardekooper shows a slight edge in second serve points with a win rate of 44.50% compared to Ryan Fishback's 41.22% in recent form. Does this give Stijn a serving advantage? Perhaps.
• In return games, Ryan Fishback outperforms Stijn, winning 48.77% of opponents' second serves and 33.70% of first serves, while Stijn's stats are lower at 44.77% and 28.36% respectively.
• Under pressure, Paardekooper has saved 60.49% of breakpoints, demonstrating stronger resilience than Fishback, who has saved 50.42%.
• Overall match performance shows Paardekooper ahead with a win rate of 66.67% (W/L 24/12) over the last year, compared to Fishback's 50.91% (W/L 28/27).
• Both players have their best career win rates on I.hard surfaces, each at 100%. However, Paardekooper struggles more on Hard courts, with just a 33% win rate.
• When considering the level of play, both have spent considerable time in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K, where Paardekooper boasts a better win percentage of 66.67% compared to Fishback's 52.00%.
• Paardekooper has faced stronger opposition with an average opponent rank of 301.75, whereas Fishback's average opponent rank is 462.24.
• Fishback holds the advantage in deciding sets, winning 50% compared to Stijn's 29% over the last 12 months.
• In breakpoint conversion, Fishback again leads by converting 37.78% of opportunities versus Paardekooper's 30.39%.

Editorial Prediction (November 21, 2025, UTC):

As we compare the strengths and weaknesses of Stijn Paardekooper and Ryan Fishback, it becomes clear that each player brings distinct advantages to the table. Paardekooper is slightly stronger in second serve performance and resilience under pressure, whereas Fishback outshines in return games and break point conversion.

Paardekooper's overall performance over the past year is notably better with a higher win percentage, yet Fishback shows better form in return games and deciding sets. Notably, both players excel on I.hard surfaces, so surface advantage is neutralized.

Given the aforementioned statistics, Ryan Fishback seems better equipped to capitalize on breakpoint chances and holds a steady edge in return games. Despite Paardekooper's slight service and pressure advantage, Fishback's ability to handle deciding sets and break points effectively may serve him well in upcoming challenges. Based on the analyzed data, Ryan Fishback is anticipated to have the upper hand in the upcoming match.